Robust fiber orientation distribution function estimation using deep constrained spherical deconvolution for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a critical imaging method for capturing and modeling tissue microarchitecture at a millimeter scale. A common practice to model the measured DW-MRI signal is via fiber orientation distribution function (fODF). This function is the essential first step for the downstream tractography and connectivity analyses. With recent advantages in data sharing, large-scale multisite DW-MRI datasets are being made available for multisite studies. However, measurement variabilities (e.g., inter- and intrasite variability, hardware performance, and sequence design) are inevitable during the acquisition of DW-MRI. Most existing model-based methods [e.g., constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD)] and learning-based methods (e.g., deep learning) do not explicitly consider such variabilities in fODF modeling, which consequently leads to inferior performance on multisite and/or longitudinal diffusion studies. Approach: In this paper, we propose a data-driven deep CSD method to explicitly constrain the scan-rescan variabilities for a more reproducible and robust estimation of brain microstructure from repeated DW-MRI scans. Specifically, the proposed method introduces a three-dimensional volumetric scanner-invariant regularization scheme during the fODF estimation. We study the Human Connectome Project (HCP) young adults test-retest group as well as the MASiVar dataset (with inter- and intrasite scan/rescan data). The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging dataset is employed for external validation. Results: From the experimental results, the proposed data-driven framework outperforms the existing benchmarks in repeated fODF estimation. By introducing the contrastive loss with scan/rescan data, the proposed method achieved a higher consistency while maintaining higher angular correlation coefficients with the CSD modeling. The proposed method is assessing the downstream connectivity analysis and shows increased performance in distinguishing subjects with different biomarkers. Conclusion: We propose a deep CSD method to explicitly reduce the scan-rescan variabilities, so as to model a more reproducible and robust brain microstructure from repeated DW-MRI scans. The plug-and-play design of the proposed approach is potentially applicable to a wider range of data harmonization problems in neuroimaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".