MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390636446 · doi:10.53907/enpesj.v3i2.249

Towards Optimal Frequency Plans: A Survey of Frequency Assignment Strategies, Models, and Methods

2023· article· en· W4390636446 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueENP Engineering Science Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency assignmentComputer scienceTask (project management)Range (aeronautics)Context (archaeology)Interference (communication)Assignment problemMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequency assignment problem in a telecommunication network refers to the task of assigning frequencies to transmitters to minimize or eliminate interference and to optimize at least one other parameter. The literature on this task is vast and examines many parameter optimization objectives. Numerous schemes, models, and methods have been proposed. In this article, we present an extensive survey of the published studies on the frequency assignment problem in the context of a wide range of applications. Different types of optimization objectives, models and solution methods are presented in a systematic way.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.549
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it