E-comics: Pictorial Learning Media to Train Students' Viewing Skills
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background. Nowadays, education requires ways to improve the quality of students. In improving and developing the quality of students, teachers must innovate in making learning media, one of which is learning media in the form of e-comic media. Purpose. this is to find out how the benefits of e-comics in learning. Method. using quantitative methods, data obtained through interviews and distributing questionnaires to students by utilizing the google form. Results. explained that learning media using e-comics can improve student learning outcomes. From the results of the interviews, it was obtained that these students felt an attraction and were motivated in learning by using e-comics. Students feel that learning by using e-comic media, grades and learning outcomes are increasing. e-comics is also one of the learning media that is easily understood by students. Conclusion. explained that this e-comic learning media really helps teachers to see students' skills in learning. e-comics is one of the learning media that is easily understood and liked by students as well as an effective learning media to use in learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it