Photothermal effect in X-ray images for computed tomography of metallic parts: Stainless steel spheres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The environmental impact on industrial X-ray tomography systems has gained its attention in terms of image precision and metrology over recent years, yet is still complex due to the variety of applications. OBJECTIVE: The current study explores the photothermal repercussions of the overall radiation exposure time. It shows the emerging dimensional uncertainty when measuring a stainless steel sphere by means of circular tomography scans. METHODS: The authors develop a novel frame difference method for X-ray radiographies to evaluate the spatial changes induced in the projected absorption maps on the X-ray panel. The object of interest has a simple geometry for the purpose of proof of concept. The dominant source of the observed radial uncertainty is the photothermal effect due to high-energy X-ray scattering at the metal workpiece. Thermal variations are monitored by an infrared camera within the industrial tomography system, which confines that heat in the industrial grade X-ray system. RESULTS: The authors demonstrate that dense industrial computed tomography programs with major X-ray power notably affect the uncertainty of digital dimensional measurements. The registered temperature variations are consistent with dimensional changes in radiographies and hence form a source of error that might result in visible artifacts within the 3D image reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: This contribution is of fundamental value to reach the balance between the number of projections and radial uncertainty tolerance when performing analysis with X-ray dimensional exploration in precision measurements with industrial tomography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".