State Estimation with Event Sensors: Observability Analysis and Multi-sensor Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. This work investigates a state estimation problem for linear time-invariant systems based on polarized measurement information from event sensors. To enable estimator design, a new notion of observability, namely, [Formula: see text]-observability is defined with the precision parameter [Formula: see text] which relates to the worst-case performance of inferring the initial state, based on which a criterion is developed to test the [Formula: see text]-observability of discrete-time linear systems. Utilizing multisensor polarity data from event sensors and the implicit information hidden in event-triggering conditions at no-event instants, an iterative event-triggered state estimator is designed to evaluate a set containing all possible values of the state. The proposed estimator is built by outer approximation of intersecting ellipsoids that are predicted from previous state estimates and the ellipsoids inferred from received polarity information of event sensors as well as the event-triggering protocol; the estimated regions of the state derived from multisensor event measurements are fused together, the sizes of which are proved to be asymptotically bounded. Distributed implementation of the estimation algorithm utilizing a two-layer processor network of hierarchy architecture is discussed, and the temporal computational complexity of the algorithm implemented in centralized and distributed ways is analyzed. The efficiency of the proposed event-triggered state estimator is verified by numerical experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".