MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CLUSTERING SEGMENTASI PASAR PENERBANGAN BANDARA HUSEIN SASTRANEGARA – BANDUNG MENGGUNAKAN INFORMASI PENERBANGAN

2023· article· id· W4390958031 on OpenAlexaff
Fatmawati Sari, Atika Hijria Rusmayani, Marsheila Anggelina

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Manajemen Dirgantara · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Transport Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisHumanitiesComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peralihan fungsi Bandara Husein Sastranegara-Bandung ke Bandara Kertajati-Majalengka diharapkan dapat mengakomodir pergerakan transportasi udara di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui segmentasi pasar penerbangan di Bandara Husein Sastranegara-Bandung menggunakan informasi penerbangan agar memudahkan calon maskapai dalam perencanaan penerbangannya di Kertajati. Segmentasi pasar menggunakan metode clustering K-Means dengan data informasi penerbangan tahun 2017 – 2021. Data informasi penerbangan yang digunakan berasal dari statistik transportasi udara BPS, merupakan data kuantatif diantaranya data bandara asal dan tujuan yang dari atau menuju Bandara Husein Sastranegara-Bandung, data pergerakan penumpang dan kargo (kg) dari tiap – tiap rute penerbangan tersedia dalam kurun wakti 2017 – 2021. Hasil clustering menunjukan segmentasi pasar penerbangan keberangkatan dari Bandung memiliki 4 cluster segmentasi pasar, dan 3 cluster untuk tujuan Bandung. Terdapat perbedaan destinasi asal dan tujuan keluar atau menuju Bandung pada kasus keberangkatan dan kedatangan. Dominasi daerah asal atau tujuan diminati pada keberangkatan dan kedatanagn ialah Semarang. Cluster keberangkatan terbanyak menuju Kualanamu dengan rata – rata 310.218 penumpang dan 3.022.091,2 kg kargo di rute tersebut. Cluster kedatangan diminati asal Jakarta (Halim Perdanakusuma) dengan rata – rata 238.613 penumpang dan kargo yang diangkut sebanyak 692.964,14 kg terbang di rute ini.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Manajemen DirgantaraSame topicUrban Transport Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207