MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4390964139 · doi:10.1088/2631-8695/ad2033

Evaluating weather impact on vehicles: a systematic review of perceived precipitation dynamics and testing methodologies

2024· review· en· W4390964139 on OpenAlexafffund
Wing Yi Pao, Mateus Carvalho, Farimah Hosseinnouri, Long Li, Clément Rouaix, Martin Agelin‐Chaab, Horia Hangan, Ismail Gültepe, John Komar

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Research Express · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVisibilityEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceWind speedSnowMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The performance of road vehicles degrades when driving in adverse weather conditions. Weather testing for vehicles is important to understand the impacts of precipitation on vehicle performance, such as driver visibility, autonomous sensor signal, tire traction, and structural integrity due to corrosion, to ensure safety. This tutorial summarizes the essential elements for performing realistic testing by applying physical and meteorological rationale to vehicle applications. Three major topics are identified as crucial steps for precise quantitative studies, including understanding the natural precipitation characteristics, estimating the perceived precipitation experienced by a moving vehicle, and selecting data collection strategies. The methods used in current practices to investigate the effects of rain and snow on road vehicles at common facilities of outdoor test tracks, drive-through weather chambers, and climatic wind tunnels are summarized. The testing techniques and relevant instrumentations are also discussed, with considerations of factors that influence the measured data, such as particle size distribution, precipitation intensity, wind-induced droplet dynamic events, accumulation behaviour, etc. The goals of this paper are to provide a tutorial with guidelines on designing weather testing experiments for road vehicles and to promote the idea of establishing standardized methodologies for realistic vehicle testing that facilitates accurate prediction of vehicle performance in adverse weather conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.233
GPT teacher head0.492
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Research ExpressSame topicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchFrench-language works237,207