MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Data-Driven Output Regulation Using Single-Gain Tuning Regulators

2023· article· en· W4391019820 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)RegulatorComputer scienceMIMOControl engineeringConvex optimizationScalar (mathematics)Controller (irrigation)Linear systemRegular polygonEngineeringControl (management)MathematicsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current approaches to data-driven control are geared towards optimal performance, and often integrate aspects of machine learning and large-scale convex optimization, leading to complex implementations. In many applications, it may be preferable to sacrifice performance to obtain significantly simpler controller designs. We focus here on the problem of output regulation for linear systems, and revisit the so-called tuning regulator of E. J. Davison as a minimal-order data-driven design for tracking and disturbance rejection. Our proposed modification of the tuning regulator relies only on samples of the open-loop plant frequency response for design, is tuned online by adjusting a single scalar gain, and comes with a guaranteed margin of stability; this provides a faithful extension of tuning procedures for SISO integral controllers to MIMO systems with mixed constant and harmonic disturbances. The results are illustrated via application to a fourtank water control process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlFrench-language works237,207