Moving Horizon Estimation for Discrete-Time Linear Time-Invariant Systems Using Transfer Learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, we propose a novel moving horizon estimation method for discrete-time linear systems through transfer learning. Most moving horizon estimator designs require data from the considered systems of interest. However, practical processes might suffer from data availability issues, especially in a new or early operating environment. Motivated by the idea of transfer learning, this manuscript proposes a moving horizon estimator design using data from a similar but different system (i.e., source system) instead of the considered system (i.e., target system). Based on the data from the source system, we propose a novel moving horizon state estimation method for the target system and provide convergence and stability analyses. The state estimation error is upper bounded by a time-dependent sequence that is related to three types of similarities/differences between target and source systems, including initial conditions, disturbance levels, and model parameters. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated through a numerical example.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it