MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391127864 · doi:10.61091/jcmcc117-17

https://combinatorialpress.com/jcmcc-articles/volume-117/gregarious-y_5-tree-decompositions-of-tensor-product-of-complete-graphs/

2023· article· en· W4391127864 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsTree (set theory)MathematicsDecompositionProduct (mathematics)PhysicsChemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yk-tree is defined as (v1,v2,…,vk−1;vk−2vk) by taking their vertices as (v1,v2,…,vk) and edges as {(v1v2,v2v3,…,vk−2vk−1)∪(vk−2vk)}. It is also represented as (Pk−1+e). One can obtain the necessary condition as mn(m−1)(n−1)≡0(mod2(k−1)), for k≥5 to establish a Yk-tree decomposition in Km×Kn. Here the tensor product is denoted by ×. In this anuscript, it is shown that a Y5-tree (gregarious Y5-tree) decomposition exists in Km×Kn, if and only if, mn(m−1)(n−1)≡0(mod8).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it