MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391134012 · doi:10.1080/00207721.2024.2304670

Decentralised adaptive neural finite-time prescribed performance control for nonlinear large-scale systems based on command filtering

2024· article· en· W4391134012 on OpenAlexaff
Shijia Kang, Peter Liu, Huanqing Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Systems Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Scale (ratio)Computer scienceControl (management)Adaptive controlArtificial neural networkControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, the issue of decentralised adaptive neural finite-time prescribed performance control is discussed for nonstrict-feedback large-scale nonlinear interconnected systems subject to dead zones input and unknown control direction. The obstacle of ‘explosion of complex’ occurred in conventional backstepping design can be surmounted by adopting the command filter technique and nonlinearities are approximated by introducing an adaptive neural control approach. To handle the obstacles due to unknown directions and unknown interconnections, Nussbaum-type functions and two smooth functions are used and designed. Meanwhile, error compensation signals are introduced to deal with the problem associated with the dynamic surface method. To constraint the output tracking error within a predefined boundary in finite time, an improved performance function, i.e. finite-time performance function is introduced. Different from existing control results, the developed control methodology does not require any information on the boundedness of dead-zone parameters. It is further proved that the constructed controller not only assures the semi-global boundedness of all the controlled system signals, but also makes the output tracking errors reach within a predefined small set. Finally, both numerical and practical examples are supplied to further validate the effectiveness of the presented theoretic result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Systems ScienceSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207