Constraint-Satisfying Krylov Solvers for Structure-Preserving Discretizations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. A key consideration in the development of numerical schemes for time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) is the ability to preserve certain properties of the continuum solution, such as associated conservation laws or other geometric structures of the solution. There is a long history of the development and analysis of such structure-preserving discretization schemes, including both proofs that standard schemes have structure-preserving properties and proposals for novel schemes that achieve both high-order accuracy and exact preservation of certain properties of the continuum differential equation. When coupled with implicit time-stepping methods, a major downside to these schemes is that their structure-preserving properties generally rely on an exact solution of the (possibly nonlinear) systems of equations defining each time step in the discrete scheme. For small systems, this is often possible (up to the accuracy of floating-point arithmetic), but it becomes impractical for the large linear systems that arise when considering typical discretization of space-time PDEs. In this paper, we propose a modification to the standard flexible generalized minimum residual iteration that enforces selected constraints on approximate numerical solutions. We demonstrate its application to both systems of conservation laws and dissipative systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".