Learned Image Compression with Dual-Branch Encoder and Conditional Information Coding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advancements in deep learning-based image compression are notable. However, prevalent schemes that employ a serial context-adaptive entropy model to enhance rate-distortion (R-D) performance are markedly slow. Furthermore, the complexities of the encoding and decoding networks are substantially high, rendering them unsuitable for some practical applications. In this paper, we propose two techniques to balance the trade-off between complexity and performance. First, we introduce two branching coding networks to independently learn a low-resolution latent representation and a high-resolution latent representation of the input image, discriminatively representing the global and local information therein. Second, we utilize the high-resolution latent representation as conditional information for the low-resolution latent representation, furnishing it with global information, thus aiding in the reduction of redundancy between low-resolution information. We do not utilize any serial entropy models. Instead, we employ a parallel channel-wise auto-regressive entropy model for encoding and decoding low-resolution and high-resolution latent representations. Experiments demonstrate that our method is approximately twice as fast in both encoding and decoding compared to the parallelizable checkerboard context model, and it also achieves a 1.2% improvement in R-D performance compared to state-of-the-art learned image compression schemes. Our method also outperforms classical image codecs including H.266/VVC-intra (4:4:4) and some recent learned methods in rate-distortion performance, as validated by both PSNR and MS-SSIM metrics on the Kodak dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".