MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391184999 · doi:10.1353/aiq.2023.a917906

Me Tomorrow: Indigenous Views on the Future ed. by Drew H. Taylor (review)

2023· article· en· W4391184999 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Indian Quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousHistorySociologyEnvironmental ethicsPolitical sciencePhilosophyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Me Tomorrow: Indigenous Views on the Future ed. by Drew H. Taylor Hogan Schaak Drew H. Taylor, ed. Me Tomorrow: Indigenous Views on the Future. Madeira Park, BC: Douglas & McIntyre, 2021. 224 pp. Paperback, $22.95. Drew Hayden Taylor, award-winning playwright, novelist, journalist, and screenwriter, returns as compiler and editor to the "Me" series from Douglas & McIntyre in Me Tomorrow: Indigenous Views on the Future. This series of essay anthologies, all compiled and edited by Taylor, are written by Indigenous, Metis, and Inuit authors and include Me Funny (2005), Me Sexy (2012), and Me Artsy (2015). The goal of each anthology is to gather various Indigenous responses to a theme with the goal of introducing readers to Indigenous perspectives without essentializing indigeneity. Me Tomorrow focuses on the theme of "Indigenous futurisms," an offshoot of science fiction (SF) studies first theorized by Grace Dillon in the 2012 Indigenous science fiction short-story and poetry collection Walking the Clouds. The variety of viewpoints included in Me Tomorrow is broad. The authors are poets, teenage Indigenous rights activists, business people, college professors, and more. The goal that links all of these essays together, as the cover of the book tells us, is the "unraveling of linear time." Whereas traditionally White, Western SF relies on the concept of technological advancement enriching (White) human life over time, Indigenous futurism is about imagining a better future by integrating knowledge from the past; specifically, Indigenous pasts silenced in White, Western narratives. In Me Tomorrow, the variety of approaches taken to achieve this goal ranges from the manifesto, to personal narrative, to academic essay, and beyond. Whereas most Indigenous futurism has been written through the mediums of novel, short story, poem, and critical essay, Me Tomorrow includes such genres as personal narrative, self-help essay, and Q&A. The result is a sort of "transmotion" in which certain anti-racist goals are shared among the [End Page 288] writers even as they seem to disagree, at times, on specifics of how that anti-racism should manifest. For example, Clarence Louie, Chief of the Osoyoos Indian Band, cites self-help books such as Steven Covey's The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People throughout his essay as he argues for the importance of "seventh-generational thinking." Seventh-generational thinking, a concept a number of the authors in this anthology discuss, is the idea that whatever decisions are made by and for a tribe should be thought about in terms of their effect on those seven generations down the line. The revival of this concept is a perfect example of the kind of Indigenous futurism at the core of Me Tomorrow. Louie, as a businessman and the Osoyoos Indian Band's chief, argues for Indigenous people to take more responsibility with their lives and money as they strive for seventh-generational thinking. His essay relies heavily on the "pull yourself up by your own bootstraps" ideology normalized in the self-help genre. This idea, combined with Louie's seventh-generation thinking, results in a unique message that mixes ideals of hyper individuality with community responsibility. Louie encourages tribal members to come together around the values of saving and investing money in property and business ventures. On the flip side of this, but also steeped in Indigenous futurism, Shelley Knott Fire argues for a decolonization that clearly rejects parts of the more capitalistic ideology held up in Louie's essay. Whereas Louie's message is to stop Indigenous self-pity with positive thinking and to invest wisely in business ventures within Canada, the United States, and beyond, Knott Fire focuses on the cultural differences between Indigenous people and non-Indigenous people as she seeks to explore issues such as achievement disparity between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students. Knott Fire states that "the desire is to have our own worldviews, life principles and established constitutions acknowledged and coexisting with or even incorporated into today's societal norms" (128). Instead of accepting the societal norms and values of White North America, Knott Fire advocates for considering those norms. She claims that one form of Indigenous futurism would be to integrate "Biskaabiyang" into the education systems of North America (129). Biskaabiyang...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it