MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391450518 · doi:10.3390/met14020175

Effect of Alloying and Microalloying Elements on Carbides of High-Speed Steel: An Overview

2024· article· en· W4391450518 on OpenAlexaff
Yangmin Chen, Chenghuan Ye, Xiangru Chen, Qijie Zhai, Henry Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueMetals · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetal Alloys Wear and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHigh-speed steelCarbideMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In high-speed steel, carbides are essential phase constituents, which have a direct impact on engineering performance and qualities of high-speed steel. The formation, morphology, and distribution of carbides are dictated by alloying elements. In this paper, various types of carbides in high-speed steel are presented. The effects of different alloying elements such as C, W, Mo, Cr, and V on the formation of carbides in high-speed steel are discussed. Research progresses on carbide improvement by microalloying elements such as N, B, Mg, and rare earth (RE) elements are reviewed. It is reported that Cr promotes the precipitation of M2C, N enhances the formation of fibrous M2C, Mg effectively shatters the large-size carbide grid, Nb refines granular carbide MC, and rare earth elements encourage the formation of M6C, resulting in irregular M2C lamellae. The incorporation of microalloying elements improves the distribution and size of carbides and also refines the solidification structure of high-speed steel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetalsSame topicMetal Alloys Wear and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207