MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AraCovTexFinder: Leveraging the transformer-based language model for Arabic COVID-19 text identification

2024· article· en· W4391554431 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMisinformation and Its Impacts
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
FundersAthabasca University
KeywordsComputer scienceArabicTransformerCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Natural language processingLanguage modelArtificial intelligenceIdentification (biology)LinguisticsElectrical engineeringInfectious disease (medical specialty)Voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of the pandemic, the identification and processing of COVID-19-related text have emerged as critical research areas within the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP). With a growing reliance on online portals and social media for information exchange and interaction, a surge in online textual content, comprising disinformation, misinformation, fake news, and rumors has led to the phenomenon of an infodemic on the World Wide Web. Arabic, spoken by over 420 million people worldwide, stands as a significant low-resource language, lacking efficient tools or applications for the detection of COVID-19-related text. Additionally, the identification of COVID-19 text is an essential prerequisite task for detecting fake and toxic content associated with COVID-19. This gap hampers crucial COVID information retrieval and processing necessary for policymakers and health authorities. Addressing this issue, this paper introduces an intelligent Arabic COVID-19 text identification system named ‘AraCovTexFinder,’ leveraging a fine-tuned fusion-based transformer model. Recognizing the challenges posed by a scarcity of related text corpora, substantial morphological variations in the language, and a deficiency of well-tuned hyperparameters, the proposed system aims to mitigate these hurdles. To support the proposed method, two corpora are developed: an Arabic embedding corpus (AraEC) and an Arabic COVID-19 text identification corpus (AraCoV). The study evaluates the performance of six transformer-based language models (mBERT, XML-RoBERTa, mDeBERTa-V3, mDistilBERT, BERT-Arabic, and AraBERT), 12 deep learning models (combining Word2Vec, GloVe, and FastText embedding with CNN, LSTM, VDCNN, and BiLSTM), and the newly introduced model AraCovTexFinder. Through extensive evaluation, AraCovTexFinder achieves a high accuracy of 98.89 ± 0.001%, outperforming other baseline models, including transformer-based language and deep learning models. This research highlights the importance of specialized tools in low-resource languages to combat the infodemic relating to COVID-19, which can assist policymakers and health authorities in making informed decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it