MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391621957 · doi:10.3126/jbm.v7i02.62592

Users’ Behavioral Intention to Use E-Payment Service in Nepal: Based on SEM Analysis

2023· article· en· W4391621957 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Business and Management · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsQuest University Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaymentService (business)BusinessPsychologyInternet privacyComputer scienceMarketingFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Digital payments were revolutionized after 1990 in Nepal’s payment system, and the rise of ICT and mobile tech since 2010 led customers to embrace e-payments. While e-payment adoption grows, progress is needed to make bank cards default for online purchases and enhance user awareness and trust for secure digital transactions. Further, understanding user perspectives and influencing factors is crucial. Objectives: This study aims to analyze the intention of users to use e-payment services in the Nepalese context. Methods: Explanatory research design is used to meet the purpose of the study. A total of 295 respondents were selected as users of the e-payment services are increasing and there is no exact number of users identified. A structured questionnaire was developed and a pretest was carried out on 10% of the sample. Data is collected from the survey through the structured questionnaire and used the Kobo Toolbox and Interviewed from Key Informants Interview (KII) method. Results: The study shows mobile banking users are highly increasing yearly, followed by internet banking with growing users. The SEM result depicts the significant relationship between behavioral intention on user satisfaction (β = 0.191, P < 0.05), perceived usefulness (β = 0.099, P < 0.05), perceived ease of use (β = 0.084, P < 0.05), social influence (β = 0.064, P < 0.05) and perceived credibility (β =0.096, P < 0.05). Furthermore, improved credibility and ease in e-payment functions can enhance customer satisfaction. Conclusion: The study concluded that Perceived Credibility (PC), Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of and Social Influence (SCI) have an impact on user satisfaction and Behavioral Intention (BI) to use the e-payment system. Additionally, User Satisfaction was also found to be related to Behavioral Intention (BI) to use an e-payment system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it