Lucy MoffatKaufman: A People's Reformation: Building the English Church in the Elizabethan Parish. Montreal: <scp>McGill‐Queen</scp>'s University Press, 2023; pp.xxi + 346.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
their own colonizing attitudes even while seemingly convinced this was the logical course of action.It is refreshing to also find documented in this volume the more recent PAOC's attempts to redress their failures.Along these lines, Ross shows how the PAOC acknowledged its own complicity with colonial structures by entering a necessary process of apologizing for their own behaviour, even while not directly responsible for or actively participating in the Indigenous Residential Schools system.With all its limitations, this apology marks a significant moment of reckoning by the PAOC.That said, suspicion of the PAOC's motivations remains a critical concern among Indigenous communities, whereby some churches have left the denomination and formed their own organizations, as was the case with the Christian Aboriginal Fellowship of Canada (CAFC).Additionally, the question of how much of Indigenous practices and rituals can be contextualized remains a point of contention.This book goes beyond the traditional triumphalist depictions of Pentecostalism in general and the PAOC specifically, with a sobering evaluative invitation to study Pentecostalism in Canada with respect to Indigenous peoples.As the author makes clear, Indigenous Pentecostal ministries do not only bring implications for the mostly Euro-Canadian PAOC, they also have much to offer to the rest of the world.To my surprise, Ross fails to connect with all the other racialized communities who also make up the PAOC.It is important to look at these communities in terms of how they can come together with Indigenous Pentecostal ministers and work together, without having Pentecostal Euro-Canadians broker those relationships.Some of the critiques one finds in this book about the institutional structures of the PAOC and its colonial paternalistic approach also apply to how the mainly Euro-Canadian leadership deals with other racialized communities in the PAOC.Ross' critique of the absence of Indigenous leaders at the national level within the PAOC also applies to the lack of racialized leaders in general.Only when racialized people play a significant role at the national and district leadership level, will the PAOC live out not only the Indigenous principle but the Pentecostal principle as well.This book is a must read for Pentecostal scholars interested in how colonization has also crept into the Pentecostal movement.It is also a must read for Pentecostals who wish to have a more balanced appreciation of the work and legacy of the PAOC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".