Ensemble learning based transmission line fault classification using phasor measurement unit (PMU) data with explainable AI (XAI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A large volume of data is being captured through the Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU), which opens new opportunities and challenges to the study of transmission line faults. To be specific, the Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) data represents many different states of the power networks. The states of the PMU device help to identify different types of transmission line faults. For a precise understanding of transmission line faults, only the parameters that contain voltage and current magnitude estimations are not sufficient. This requirement has been addressed by generating data with more parameters such as frequencies and phase angles utilizing the Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) for data acquisition. The data has been generated through the simulation of a transmission line model on ePMU DSA tools and Matlab Simulink. Different machine learning models have been trained with the generated synthetic data to classify transmission line fault cases. The individual models including Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN) have outperformed other models in fault classification which have acquired a cross-validation accuracy of 99.84%, 99.83%, and 99.76% respectively across 10 folds. Soft voting has been used to combine the performance of these best-performing models. Accordingly, the constructed ensemble model has acquired a cross-validation accuracy of 99.88% across 10 folds. The performance of the combined models in the ensemble learning process has been analyzed through explainable AI (XAI) which increases the interpretability of the input parameters in terms of making predictions. Consequently, the developed model has been evaluated with several performance matrices, such as precision, recall, and f1 score, and also tested on the IEEE 14 bus system. To sum up, this article has demonstrated the classification of six scenarios including no fault and fault cases from transmission lines with a significant number of training parameters and also interpreted the effect of each parameter to make predictions of different fault cases with great success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".