MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391846242 · doi:10.1186/s12938-024-01216-0

StairNet: visual recognition of stairs for human–robot locomotion

2024· article· en· W4391846242 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioMedical Engineering OnLine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersVector InstituteToronto Rehabilitation InstituteAGE-WELL
KeywordsComputer scienceStairsDeep learningArtificial intelligenceSoftware deploymentSet (abstract data type)InferenceMachine learningRobotMobile deviceConvolutional neural networkHuman–computer interactionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human-robot walking with prosthetic legs and exoskeletons, especially over complex terrains, such as stairs, remains a significant challenge. Egocentric vision has the unique potential to detect the walking environment prior to physical interactions, which can improve transitions to and from stairs. This motivated us to develop the StairNet initiative to support the development of new deep learning models for visual perception of real-world stair environments. In this study, we present a comprehensive overview of the StairNet initiative and key research to date. First, we summarize the development of our large-scale data set with over 515,000 manually labeled images. We then provide a summary and detailed comparison of the performances achieved with different algorithms (i.e., 2D and 3D CNN, hybrid CNN and LSTM, and ViT networks), training methods (i.e., supervised learning with and without temporal data, and semi-supervised learning with unlabeled images), and deployment methods (i.e., mobile and embedded computing), using the StairNet data set. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future directions. To date, our StairNet models have consistently achieved high classification accuracy (i.e., up to 98.8%) with different designs, offering trade-offs between model accuracy and size. When deployed on mobile devices with GPU and NPU accelerators, our deep learning models achieved inference speeds up to 2.8 ms. In comparison, when deployed on our custom-designed CPU-powered smart glasses, our models yielded slower inference speeds of 1.5 s, presenting a trade-off between human-centered design and performance. Overall, the results of numerous experiments presented herein provide consistent evidence that StairNet can be an effective platform to develop and study new deep learning models for visual perception of human-robot walking environments, with an emphasis on stair recognition. This research aims to support the development of next-generation vision-based control systems for robotic prosthetic legs, exoskeletons, and other mobility assistive technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score0.494

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it