Multiple objectives dynamic VM placement for application service availability in cloud networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Ensuring application service availability is a critical aspect of delivering quality cloud computing services. However, placing virtual machines (VMs) on computing servers to provision these services can present significant challenges, particularly in terms of meeting the requirements of application service providers. In this paper, we present a framework that addresses the NP-hard dynamic VM placement problem in order to optimize application availability in cloud computing paradigm. The problem is modeled as an integer nonlinear programming (INLP) optimization with multiple objectives and constraints. The framework comprises three major modules that use optimization methods and algorithms to determine the most effective VM placement strategy in cases of application deployment, failure, and scaling. Our primary goals are to minimize power consumption, resource waste, and server failures while also ensuring that application availability requirements are met. We compare our proposed heuristic VM placement solution with three related algorithms from the literature and find that it outperforms them in several key areas. Our solution is able to admit more applications, reduce power consumption, and increase CPU and RAM utilization of the servers. Moreover, we use a deep learning method that has high accuracy and low error loss to predict application task failures, allowing for proactive protection actions to reduce service outage. Overall, our framework provides a comprehensive solution by optimizing dynamic VM placement. Therefore, the framework can improve the quality of cloud computing services and enhance the experience for users.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".