Object Rotation and Translation for Serial Planar Acoustic Microassembly
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Damage-prone microscale products that need to be mass-assembled, such as surface mount devices, would benefit from being assembled in mid-air using acoustic forces. These forces can manipulate objects without contact, thereby circumventing damage. However, joining two objects together, which is a key step in assembly, is challenging to do acoustically because as the objects approach each other, the acoustic waves scattering off one object begins to greatly impact the position and orientation of the other object. Previous demonstrations of acoustic microassembly have demonstrated various techniques to overcome the acoustic scattering force, such as assembling, within a gel medium or using a robotic arm for object translation but there is still no way of achieving complex, configurable, 3-D assemblies in mid-air by purely using acoustic waves. To better maintain the object's orientation under a dominating acoustic scattering effect, we developed a new acoustic rotation algorithm called the two-segment phase gradient (TSPG) algorithm, which can rotate the object with an rms error of 12<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{\circ }$</tex-math></inline-formula> under open-loop control while maintaining the object's centroid with an root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.41 mm. Next, we demonstrate an alternative technique to overcome the acoustic scattering force by using the widely used single trap algorithm to cause one object to jump toward another object at a specified position and orientation. Finally, we demonstrate how the TSPG algorithm and single trap algorithm can be used to generate complex and configurable 2-D assemblies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it