Mechanical alloying of AlCoCrFe and AlCoCrFeNi: Design and experimental evaluation of medium- and high-entropy alloy particles for cold spraying
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The manufacturability of equiatomic high-entropy alloy (HEA) particles with single- and dual-phase crystal structures using the high-energy mechanical alloying (HE-MA) method was explored in this study. Following a material design-of-experiment (DoE) curriculum, particles were synthesized in a planetary mill. Milling times varied while operating under two distinct HE-MA manufacturing regimes: the conventional approach (simultaneous milling of constituent elements) and the sequential method (progressive milling with the introduction of elements in a specific order). Within the conventional regime, equiatomic AlCoCrFe and AlCoCrFeNi blends were milled, focusing on the influence of incorporating nickel (Ni) as a transient element into the base composition. This led to an equivalent particle size distribution ranging from 5 to 100 μm. Notably, the presence of Ni resulted in an increased fraction of the face-centered cubic (FCC) phase, coupled with a simultaneous reduction in grain and crystallite sizes, thereby enhancing the overall material strength. This knowledge was applied to the design and synthesis of a target equiatomic FeNiCoCrAl HEA system. In this context, individual elements were added to the starting/milled Fe + Ni alloy at four-hour intervals, in line with the sequential milling regimen. The results showed an interesting evolution: the conventionally milled AlCoCrFeNi particles exhibited a dual-phase body-centered cubic (BCC) and FCC structure, with a composition of 55% BCC and 45% FCC phase fractions, while the sequentially milled FeNiCoCrAl particles demonstrated a single-phase BCC structure after 24 h of milling. • Detailed DoE varying composition and milling parameters for HEAs was performed. • Synthesis of HEAs with varying phases via sequential and conventional milling. • FeNiCoCrAl HEA alloy production in a shorter cycle using higher milling speed. • Ni addition increased plasticity in the HEA increasing the milling time requirement. • Increase in particle hardness of AlCoCrFeNi as a result of finer grain was observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".