Continuity of cost in Borkar control topology and implications on discrete space and time approximations for controlled diffusions under several criteria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We first show that the discounted cost, cost up to an exit time, and ergodic cost involving controlled non-degenerate diffusions are continuous on the space of stationary control policies when the policies are given a topology introduced by Borkar [V. S. Borkar, A topology for Markov controls, Applied Mathematics and Optimization 20 (1989), 55–62]. The same applies for finite horizon problems when the control policies are Markov and the topology is revised to include time also as a parameter. We then establish that finite action/piecewise constant stationary policies are dense in the space of stationary Markov policies under this topology and the same holds for continuous policies. Using the above mentioned continuity and denseness results we establish that finite action/piecewise constant policies approximate optimal stationary policies with arbitrary precision. This gives rise to the applicability of many numerical methods such as policy iteration and stochastic learning methods for discounted cost, cost up to an exit time, and ergodic cost optimal control problems in continuous-time. For the finite-horizon setup, we establish additionally near optimality of time-discretized policies by an analogous argument. We thus present a unified and concise approach for approximations directly applicable under several commonly adopted cost criteria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".