MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392112000 · doi:10.1353/gsr.2024.a919911

Queer Lives across the Wall: Desire and Danger in Divided Berlin, 1945–1970 by Andrea Rottmann (review)

2024· article· en· W4392112000 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGerman Studies Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerArtArt historyHistoryAestheticsPsychoanalysisSociologyGender studiesPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Queer Lives across the Wall: Desire and Danger in Divided Berlin, 1945–1970 by Andrea Rottmann Mark Fenemore Queer Lives across the Wall: Desire and Danger in Divided Berlin, 1945–1970. By Andrea Rottmann. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2023. Pp. xiv + 247. Paper $36.95. ISBN 9781487547806. This is a truly remarkable book. Going beyond merely cataloging the most dominant queer traces and spaces of postwar Berlin, the author's aim is nothing less than to provide a full and inclusive cityscape of sexuality. By pointing to their role in self-fashioning, the book seeks to bring the full range of queer subjective experiences vividly to life. This expands the scope of previous iterations by Mort, Chauncey, Houlbrook, Beachy, and Evans, in which cis gay men's experiences predominated. Recognizing that queer people in the past are "both similar and different to us," Rottmann points to the problems inherent in attempting to "draw clean analytical borders" around sexual identities (13, 7). This is the first book to map out a sexual cityscape in which lesbian and trans identities are not only present but prominent. In particular, it focuses on individuals whose "unusual" cross-dressing also posed a challenge to the norms of the contemporary queer community (3). In contrast to narratives that ignore or marginalize them, Rottmann highlights the crucial role played by "feminine men, trans women, and non-binary queers" in creating a genuinely queer scene (161). Non-normative gender expressions are as important to the author as same-sex desire. While critiquing it as reduced to some kind of "queer Eldorado" (8), the book retains some of Berlin's mythic magnetic power as a symbol of queer freedom. Rottmann opens it with a depiction of the cross-dressing legend (and irrepressible force of personality) Mamita. Just as the latter's humor and enthusiasm were contagious, winning over even her most hardened enemies, so too Rottmann's open-minded approach to documenting diverse queer subjective identities proves infectious. Not only do the protagonists seem familiar and endearing by the end of the book but also the breadth of experience, as presented in its pages, is exhilarating and intoxicating. The exhaustive archival search process Rottmann chronicles for identifying queer experiences beyond cis gay men is remarkable in its complexity and nuance. Faced with similar adversity, many other scholars would have simply given up and gone home. Rottmann, however, is dogged in chasing down leads and unlocking even the most apparently austere and barren of archives. In the process, a whole series of inner worlds open up to reveal their subjective secrets. Together, oral histories, photographs, official documents, letters, and diaries provide crucial fragments with which to reconstruct changing subjectivities. Rottmann points to the lack of a public [End Page 171] sphere accessible to queer historians in East Germany. Even in the West, queer people often had to destroy documentary evidence so as not to incriminate themselves or their lovers. Sometimes, as a consequence, it is necessary to read non-queer sources "queerly" against the grain. The book thus juxtaposes insider accounts—created by those who frequented the ballrooms and bars—with outside views of sexologists and psychologists. Pointing to their importance as spaces in which to construct queer identities, the book contains documentation of more private spaces like homes and gardens. The intimate photographs reveal how lesbians developed queer self-knowledge through playful enactments of eroticism. Chronologically, the book stretches from the end of Nazism to the beginning of the 1970s. Its chapters juxtapose home and prison bodies with queer nightlife and cruising spaces. Rottmann seeks a broadening of the academic gaze/discourse beyond a narrow focus on entertainment, legal restrictions, or homophile politics. The book thus avoids overly focusing on criminalization and the sources such machinery generates. Similarly, by shearing and censoring problematic elements, oral histories can also skew our understanding of sexual lives in the past. Paying attention to the "gestures and demeanor," as well as nuances like hairstyles and clothing, the book sketches out the delicate performances of gender over the jagged faultline of the Cold War. Instead of marked differences between the two German states, Susanne zur Nieden saw a "homophobic consensus" (9...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it