MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Strengthening Open Radio Access Networks: Advancing Safeguards Through ZTA and Deep Learning

2023· article· en· W4392158122 on OpenAlexafffund
Hajar Moudoud, Wissal Hamhoum, Soumaya Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceRadio frequencyComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Open Radio Access Networks (O-RAN) are gaining momentum because of their ability to provide greater vendor flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and scalability, making it an attractive choice for network operators. However, securing O-RAN has become an essential concern due to the inherent vulnerabilities and risks associated with their open nature. Zero trust architecture (ZTA) can help address the security issues associated with O-RAN. ZTA is a security model that assumes that all devices, users, and applications are potentially hostile and cannot be trusted until verified. In addition to ZTA, the integration of deep learning techniques can allow for the detection and prevention of sophisticated cyber threats in real-time. In this work, we propose a novel approach to securing O-RAN using ZTA and Deep Sarsa reinforcement learning algorithms. First, we developed a ZTA model using an open-source approach that can be used as the base architecture for our study. Then, we present our proposed approach, which uses Deep Sarsa to learn the optimal policy for enforcing access control rules on the network resources based on user authentication data from ZTA. Finally, we evaluate our model using real data sets and show that it performs better than other approaches in terms of accuracy, F1 score, and precision. Our results demonstrate that combining ZTA with reinforcement learning is a promising way to help secure O-RAN while still providing flexible access control policies for operators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityFrench-language works237,207