MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392191369 · doi:10.18280/mmep.110213

Developing Hybrid CNN-GRU Arrhythmia Prediction Models Using Fast Fourier Transform on Imbalanced ECG Datasets

2024· article· en· W4392191369 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zahraa Ch. Oleiwi, Ebtesam N. AlShemmary, Salam Al-Augby

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Kufa
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFourier transformPattern recognition (psychology)Discrete Fourier transform (general)Short-time Fourier transformFourier analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are many methods to diagnose heart disease; the most effective way is to analyze electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. Generally, the automatic classification techniques based on ECG analysis consist of three steps: data preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification. This study designed eight hybrid model architectures using several types of deep neural networks, including Convolution Neural Network (CNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Bidirectional GRU (Bi-GRU), four of them without Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and the rest using FFT. Firstly, the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database is cleaned using the wavelet (WT) thresholding method that separates the combined noise and signal frequencies, making it ideal for processing nonstationary ECG signals. Additionally, the imbalance problem in this database was addressed using the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE), which is more suitable for medical data than random synthesis methods. Secondly, hybrid models FFT-CNN, FFT-GRU, FFT-CNN-GRU, and FFT-CNN-Bi-GRU are constructed using the new proposed architecture by concatenating resultant features from two paths, the first path using ECG in the time domain and the second path using the resultant spectrum of ECG from FFT as input. A comparative study of the performance of all models was created in terms of accuracy, training time, number of trainable parameters, and robustness against noise. The results show that the proposed CNN, GRU, CNN-GRU, and CNN-Bi-GRU models without WT and FFT achieved 90%, 93%, 95%, and 96% accuracies, while the proposed FFT-CNN, FFT-GRU, FFT-CNN-GRU, and FFT-CNN-Bi-GRU models achieved 97%, 95%, 96%, and 97% accuracies with WT. So, the proposed FFT-CNN model was the best, with less training time and parameters than other models, which significantly impacts designing a high-efficiency model with less complexity for a practical medical diagnosis system. On the other hand, using FFT improved all models' performance, accuracy and robustness against noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207