Developing Hybrid CNN-GRU Arrhythmia Prediction Models Using Fast Fourier Transform on Imbalanced ECG Datasets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are many methods to diagnose heart disease; the most effective way is to analyze electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. Generally, the automatic classification techniques based on ECG analysis consist of three steps: data preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification. This study designed eight hybrid model architectures using several types of deep neural networks, including Convolution Neural Network (CNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Bidirectional GRU (Bi-GRU), four of them without Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and the rest using FFT. Firstly, the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database is cleaned using the wavelet (WT) thresholding method that separates the combined noise and signal frequencies, making it ideal for processing nonstationary ECG signals. Additionally, the imbalance problem in this database was addressed using the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE), which is more suitable for medical data than random synthesis methods. Secondly, hybrid models FFT-CNN, FFT-GRU, FFT-CNN-GRU, and FFT-CNN-Bi-GRU are constructed using the new proposed architecture by concatenating resultant features from two paths, the first path using ECG in the time domain and the second path using the resultant spectrum of ECG from FFT as input. A comparative study of the performance of all models was created in terms of accuracy, training time, number of trainable parameters, and robustness against noise. The results show that the proposed CNN, GRU, CNN-GRU, and CNN-Bi-GRU models without WT and FFT achieved 90%, 93%, 95%, and 96% accuracies, while the proposed FFT-CNN, FFT-GRU, FFT-CNN-GRU, and FFT-CNN-Bi-GRU models achieved 97%, 95%, 96%, and 97% accuracies with WT. So, the proposed FFT-CNN model was the best, with less training time and parameters than other models, which significantly impacts designing a high-efficiency model with less complexity for a practical medical diagnosis system. On the other hand, using FFT improved all models' performance, accuracy and robustness against noise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".