A Triple Fixed-Point Theorem for Orthogonal ℓ-Compatible Maps in Orthogonal Complete Metric Space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fixed-point techniques are fundamental in mathematical analysis, providing versatile tools for solving various problems across different domains.The utility of these techniques has attracted considerable interest from researchers, leading to numerous investigations and developments in this area.This article introduces the new concept of a hybrid pair of an orthogonal ℓ-compatible map on orthogonal-complete metric space.We prove some common triple-fixed-point results for such contractions.We have achieved several significant outcomes regarding triple fixed points for contraction mappings.These outcomes not only advance the theory of fixed-point theorems but also facilitate practical applications in mathematical modeling and analysis.To exhibit the potency of our approach, we provide an example that demonstrates the soundness of the new theorem premise, highlighting its relevance and applicability in real-world situations.The discoveries presented in this article have important implications for the study of integral equations.By using the triple fixed-point results established here, we can prove the existence of solutions to integral equations, which helps to solve important problems in mathematical physics, engineering, and other fields.In general, the contributions of this work expand the horizons of fixed-point theory and offer valuable insights into its applications in various areas of mathematics and beyond.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".