OBSTransformer: a deep-learning seismic phase picker for OBS data using automated labelling and transfer learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Accurate seismic phase detection and onset picking are fundamental to seismological studies. Supervised deep-learning phase pickers have shown promise with excellent performance on land seismic data. Although it may be acceptable to apply them to Ocean Bottom Seismometer (OBS) data that are indispensable for studying ocean regions, they suffer from a significant performance drop. In this study, we develop a generalized transfer-learned OBS phase picker—OBSTransformer, based on automated labelling and transfer learning. First, we compile a comprehensive data set of catalogued earthquakes recorded by 423 OBSs from 11 temporary deployments worldwide. Through automated processes, we label the P and S phases of these earthquakes by analysing the consistency of at least three arrivals from four widely used machine learning pickers (EQTransformer, PhaseNet, Generalized Phase Detection and PickNet), as well as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) picker. This results in an inclusive OBS data set containing ∼36 000 earthquake samples. Subsequently, we use this data set for transfer learning and utilize a well-trained land machine learning model—EQTransformer as our base model. Moreover, we extract 25 000 OBS noise samples from the same OBS networks using the Kurtosis method, which are then used for model training alongside the labelled earthquake samples. Using three groups of test data sets at subglobal, regional and local scales, we demonstrate that OBSTransformer outperforms EQTransformer. Particularly, the P and S recall rates at large distances (>200 km) are increased by 68 and 76 per cent, respectively. Our extensive tests and comparisons demonstrate that OBSTransformer is less dependent on the detection/picking thresholds and is more robust to noise levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it