Preservation of fruits through drying—A comprehensive review of experiments and modeling approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A significant part of the world's population still has problems in accessing food. The growing world population will exacerbate this issue in the future. Innovative studies conducted in this field play a crucial role in addressing the issue of drying and storage of foods. Atmospheric drying methods, such as rotary, tunnel, conveyor, cabinet, tower, and kiln dryers, offer advantages in relation to high production capacities, cost‐effective initial setup, and economical operating conditions. However, concurrently, the weaknesses of these methods arise from factors such as drying duration, uneven moisture content, and space requirements. The solar dryer method is especially effective in dehydrating agricultural products, offering an energy‐saving advantage compared to other methods. However, it is important to note that this approach, which involves exposing crops to direct sunlight, comes with several drawbacks affecting both food quality and health. In cases where the quality of highly valued foodstuffs is crucial, subatmospheric drying methods like vacuum, freeze, and microwave freeze are typically preferred. However, the primary drawback of this approach lies in its high operating costs, particularly in terms of energy consumption. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can be used for predictive modeling, helping to forecast drying behavior and optimize process parameters in food drying applications especially nonlinear connections among variables. ANNs are adept at managing nonlinearities, offering a more precise depiction of the intricate interactions within food drying systems. This review examines articles from the last 5 years in the literature, synthesizing research conducted in food drying. The findings indicate a predominant interest among researchers in methodologies with lower environmental impact, prompting increased attention to studies addressing this aspect. There is a notable emphasis on the frequent exploration of energy‐efficient systems. The ongoing research focuses on the development of methods utilizing ultrasonic, infrared radiation, and electrohydrodynamic techniques to achieve more effective, shorter‐duration, energy‐efficient drying processes with enhanced control over the final product.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".