MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392446389 · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ad304b

Modeling turbulent impurity transport in the SOL of DIII-D with a reduced model

2024· article· en· W4392446389 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFusion Energy SciencesOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsDIII-DImpurityTurbulenceMaterials scienceMechanicsPhysicsStatistical physicsNuclear physicsTokamakPlasmaQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A novel impurity transport model that approximates SOL turbulence as a fluctuating poloidal electric field is shown to be an acceptable replacement for the traditional approach of assigning an arbitrary radial diffusion coefficient to the impurity ions. The model is implemented in the DIVIMP impurity transport code and applied to an L-Mode tungsten divertor experiment on DIII-D. The poloidal electric field is represented as fluctuating between ±1000 V m −1 based on previous measurements. The resulting intermittent v r = E θ × B T transport causes ions to transport both into the core as well as into the far-SOL. Simultaneous agreement with estimates of the W density just inside the separatrix as well as in the far-SOL is obtained (n W ∼ 10 14 m −3 and n W ∼ 10 12 m −3 , respectively). Prompt re-deposition of the W ions was necessary to obtain agreement (f redep ∼ 99%). We conclude that simulating impurity transport using a physics-based approximation for turbulence in the SOL, versus arbitrarily assigning diffusion coefficients, may enable better reactor scale predictions of core impurity contamination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it