FedDMC: Efficient and Robust Federated Learning via Detecting Malicious Clients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) has gained popularity in the field of machine learning, which allows multiple participants to collaboratively learn a highly-accurate global model without exposing their sensitive data. However, FL is susceptible to poisoning attacks, in which malicious clients manipulate local model parameters to corrupt the global model. Existing FL frameworks based on detecting malicious clients suffer from unreasonable assumptions (e.g., clean validation datasets) or fail to balance robustness and efficiency. To address these deficiencies, we propose FedDMC, which implements robust federated learning by efficiently and precisely detecting malicious clients. Specifically, FedDMC first applies principal component analysis to reduce the dimensionality of the model parameters, which retains the primary parameter feature and reduces the computational overhead for subsequent clustering. Then, a binary tree-based clustering method with noise is designed to eliminate the effect of noisy points in the clustering process, facilitating accurate and efficient malicious client detection. Finally, we design a self-ensemble detection correction module that utilizes historical results via exponential moving averages to improve the robustness of malicious client detection. Extensive experiments conducted on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that FedDMC outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of detection precision, global model accuracy, and computational complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".