MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392507158 · doi:10.1080/0025570x.2024.2312093

On the Basel Problem and the Square of Gregory’s Series

2024· article· en· W4392507158 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics Magazine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSeries (stratigraphy)Square (algebra)Calculus (dental)Mathematical economicsGeometryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SummaryIf we consider the Madhava–Gregory–Leibniz seriesπ4=1−13+15−⋯,which is commonly referred to as the Gregory series, and then compare it to Euler’s formulaπ28=1+132+152+⋯,the following question arises: Can this latter formula be derived by squaring both sides of the former? There have been several proofs of Euler’s formula, or its equivalent formulation ζ(2)=π2/6, based on the idea of squaring 1−13+15−⋯=π4, including a proof presented in a letter from Euler to Goldbach dating from 1742. We consider the history of proofs of this form, and we offer another simple proof of ζ(2)=π2/6 that also relies on squaring Gregory’s series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it