MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392587446 · doi:10.1353/aiq.2023.a921875

Allotment Stories: Indigenous Land Relations Under Settler Siege , ed. by Daniel Heath Justice and Jean M. O'Brien (review)

2023· article· en· W4392587446 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Indian Quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllotmentSiegeIndigenousEconomic JusticeHistorySociologyEnvironmental ethicsArchaeologyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Allotment Stories: Indigenous Land Relations Under Settler Siege, ed. by Daniel Heath Justice and Jean M. O'Brien Katie Walkiewicz Allotment Stories: Indigenous Land Relations Under Settler Siege, edited by Daniel Heath Justice and Jean M. O'Brien. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2022. 369 pp. Paperback, $28.00. My family's allotments skirt the northern edge of Township 29 North, Range 21 East on the Cherokee Nation plat maps. Their plots of farmland sit clustered together, just west of the Neosho River and Miami Nation. Multiple generations of women in my family fought to keep this land they collectively farmed intact, thus keeping the family together. Eventually, my great-grandmother Mary would relocate about one hundred miles southwest to Tulsa, where my grandfather and mother were born. I grew up even farther, about 170 miles away in Stillwater, Oklahoma, and have never visited that land. However, looking at the aerial views, I can envision what it looks and smells like. I can hear the locust (cicada) songs that are the iconic playlist of thick, humid nights in that part of the world, and which ᎢᏯ ᏗᎯ / iya dihi / Candessa Tehee (Cherokee Nation) describes in her contribution to Allotment Stories. But the point stands: I've never been to my family's allotment land, and alienation from that place brought a cascade of other distances that produced a kind of forced exile-in-proximity across two generations of my family. I start with my own allotment experience because, as Allotment Stories convincingly demonstrates, for many people who endured the dispossessive violence of allotment, those personal stories are what we have. Moreover, one of the aims of allotment was to flatten, if not entirely erase, Indigenous specificity by attempting to quantify Indigeneity via blood and force Indigenous people to operate as liberal colonial subjects rather than as members of robust Indigenous nations and kinship networks. As Darren O'Toole (Métis) poignantly reminds us in his contribution to this volume, the "transition from a people to a population is one of the most important knowledge-power relations [End Page 388] underlying the policy of allotment" (81). Allotment sought to break the stories, like the land, because they tell us who we are and why that matters. In response, Allotment Stories emphasizes the power of narrative by assembling a collection of poetic, personally inflected essays and academic writings that show how and why the privatization of land is and always was about Indigenous dispossession. Just as critically, the collection celebrates the many ways Indigenous people have actively challenged allotment and continued to live and thrive in spite of settler colonization. Most of the contributors are themselves Indigenous, and the chorus of their collective voices is itself an irreverent reminder that Teddy Roosevelt's description of allotment as a "mighty pulverizing machine" (a quote referenced in the introduction and multiple essays) failed to destroy everything (xiii). Allotment Stories brings together an extensive range of essays on the topic and, in doing so, attends to the many scales of life transformed by privatization-as-dispossession. Throughout the various pieces, readers learn more about the slew of treaties, acts, and other formal and informal policies crafted to steal Indigenous land, fracture kinship networks, and erode Indigenous sovereignty. The range of Indigenous peoples, geographies, time periods, academic disciplines, genres of writing, and languages the collection represents is one of its greatest strengths. Leanne Betasamosake Simpson's interludes remind us that the settler-constructed dams, changed waterways, and stolen and developed land that accompanied allotment also had devastating impacts on more-than-human kin like Amik (beaver). Some of the most profound moments in the collection are when authors share the life stories of specific individuals, like Louisa, Pearl, Edna, Frank, Uncle Don, Mary, and Fanny. Learning how these relatives fought against allotment, not just the dividing up of land but also efforts to break up families and nations, offers readers a clear sense of what Justice and O'Brien term the "restorative resilience" of Indigenous people. However, restorative resilience takes many forms in Allotment Stories. Seemingly counterintuitive measures like privatized land purchases (Mustonen and Feodoroff) or the organization of corporations (Velaise), speak to Indigenous ingenuity and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it