MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392589700 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-795

Assessing meteorological fire danger over Europe based on a statistical model of satellite-derived fire radiative power

2024· preprint· en· W4392589700 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMilitary Defense Systems Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSatelliteRadiative transferEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyFire detectionClimatologyRemote sensingGeographyArchitectural engineeringAerospace engineeringGeologyEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Satellite Application Facility for Land Surface Analysis (LSA SAF), that is part of EUMETSAT’s ground segment, operationally disseminates daily forecasts of meteorological fire danger over Mediterranean Europe. The so-called Fire Risk Map (FRM) product relies on estimates of the probability of exceedance of predefined thresholds of daily released energy by active fires as derived from a Generalized Pareto model that uses FWI as covariate for the scale parameter; FWI, the Fire Weather Index (FWI), is part of the Canadian Fire Weather Index System and has proven to be very suitable to rate fire danger over Europe.The aim of this study is to extend the procedure to Northern and Central Europe making use of a statistical model of Fire Radiative Power (FRP) as derived from MODIS observations over Europe covering the period 2000-2022. Following the approach developed by DaCamara et al. (2023), the statistical model consists of an 8 parameter, doubly truncated lognormal body distribution with generalized Pareto tails, using FWI as a covariate of its parameters.First, Europe is divided into eight regions according to the recorded number of hotspots and to the averaged FRP over the study period. Each one of those regions is then stratified into three subregions according to the dominant land cover type, i.e., forest, shrub, or agriculture. For each of the subregions, a statistical model is fitted to the sample of historical records of FRP together with the associated sample of FWI values obtained from the Copernicus Emergency Management Service.The fitted models are then applied to Europe to generate monthly climatological values of probability of exceedance of prescribed thresholds of FRP. This information is used to define appropriate limits for classes of fire danger (i.e. low, moderate, high, very high and extreme) for each subregion of Europe. Finally, these classes are validated by analyzing the distribution of recorded FRP among the classes and by examining maps for extreme fire events. This work was supported by EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Land Surface Analysis (LSA SAF) and by Instituto Dom Luiz (IDL), a research unit financed with national funds (PIDDAC) by FCT (UIDB/50019/2020). References:DaCamara, C. C., Libonati, R., Nunes, S. A., de Zea Bermudez, P., & Pereira, J. M. C. (2023). Global-scale statistical modelling of the radiative power released by vegetation fires using a doubly truncated lognormal body distribution with generalized Pareto tails. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129049

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMilitary Defense Systems AnalysisFrench-language works237,207