MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392628723 · doi:10.26868/25222708.2023.1400

Ensemble transfer learning strategy in forecasting power consumption for residential buildings

2023· article· en· W4392628723 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Simulation Conference proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceEnsemble forecastingTransfer of learningEnsemble learningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningPower consumptionPredictive powerDeep learningEnergy consumptionLong short term memoryData modelingPredictive modellingPower (physics)Transfer (computing)Recurrent neural networkArtificial neural networkEngineeringDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an ensemble transfer learning (TL) technique for predicting one-hour-ahead building power consumption with limited historical data, thereby addressing the data scarcity issues in the first year of building energy prediction. In the first step, four long short-term memory (LSTM) pre-trained models are constructed from the source buildings to capture diverse data patterns and develop transfer learning-based long short-term memory (TL-LSTM) models. The prediction performance is then enhanced by employing a weighted average ensemble technique to combine the TL-LSTM models. The result demonstrates that the ensemble TL achieves better prediction performance than the conventional LSTM- and TL-LSTM models for comparison.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it