MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392731496 · doi:10.1103/physics.16.200

Solid-State Physicist Turns to Rocks

2023· article· en· W4392731496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicistSolid-stateState (computer science)PhysicsTheoretical physicsEngineering physicsNanotechnologyMaterials scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There, Poduska helped elucidate the origins and formation conditions of millennia-old geological and anthropogenic samples from sites including Neolithic villages that had been buried for thousands of years.To uncover the histories of these ancient objects, she used the spectroscopy and surface chemistry techniques that she had previously used in Canada to examine pristine, lab-made semiconductor materials.But now, rather than pristine samples, she was Credit: K. Poduska; APS/Carin Cain working with specimens that had been buried for thousands of years.She says that she found it deeply satisfying that she could use standard materials-science techniques to answer questions about items that came from the ground.Physics Magazine caught up with Poduska to learn more about the challenges that a solid-state physicist faces when they get their hands dirty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it