MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392774805 · doi:10.4043/34667-ms

Successful Decarbonization of Drilling Fluids by Using Highly Efficient Technology and Reduced Chemical Usage, Logistics, and Casing Sections

2024· article· en· W4392774805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference Asia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsImpactCanadian Standards Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasingPetroleum engineeringDrillingDrilling fluidFossil fuelProcess engineeringManufacturing engineeringEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineeringEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In accordance with the industry’s efforts to reduce its carbon footprint in all phases of operation, it has become vital to investigate innovative ways of reducing pollution to acceptable levels and to optimize drilling fluid usage and formulations. As the main us er of chemical products during the drilling phase, the drilling fluid has a significant effect on the carbon footprint, which is exacerbated when drilling fluid losses occur. An innovative technology has proven to be a very efficient sealant, displacing a number of conventional materials used to reinforce the wellbore while drilling. Thus, the use of calcium carbonate, graphite, Gilsonite, and asphalt, among other products, has been significantly reduced or in some cases, eliminated, from the formulation of specific drilling fluids, due to a technology that provides a thin but highly competent shield that prevents the invasion of fluid and pressure into the formation, thereby expanding the operative window. This technology is used in the drilling fluid, so that every freshly drilled rock is immediately sealed with flexible particles thus preventing the start of fluid invasion and wellbore washout. This technology enables the operator to reduce not only the amount of chemical products used in the drilling fluid, but also to save casing sections due to the increase in the operative window, prevent drilling fluid loss, reduce land and offshore transportation to the wellsite, and consequently reduce the supply chain process from the original source of the raw materials, manufactured products, to the end users at the rig site. The average total amount of chemical products utilized per well drilled has decreased by 34%, which has a significant impact on the supply chain, including transportation, associated logistics, and raw materials, among other components. In addition, each time a casing section is saved, the carbon footprint is lowered, saving casing section (steel production), cementing materials, wireline logging, rig days, logistics, and so on. This paper will discuss the technological strategy chosen to deploy this sort of technology, the results obtained in terms of operations efficiency, and an estimated calculation of carbon footprint reduction per operation completed. The materials previously used control potential drilling fluid losses were inflexible and sensitive to shear pressures, such as calcium carbonate, and their size was constantly changing, undermining their ability to form a dependable seal. In contrast, the focus of this research is selecting material that is flexible, making it resistant to shear forces. As it flexes to conform to the size and shape of the pore throat, the elastic capacity mitigates the uncertainties for the best design in a given particle size distribution pore throat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it