Aboriginal People, Economic Development And Entrepreneurship
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores economic development and entrepreneurship in an Aboriginal context. The paper begins with an overview of the socioeconomic circumstances of the Aboriginal people inCanada.It then goes on to consider the approach that Aboriginal people have developed to address these circumstances and the outcomes they have achieved.Throughout, the emphasis is on the role of entrepreneurship and land claims/treaty rights in the development process. This paper explores economic development in anAboriginal context with a focus on the role of entrepreneurship in the process.The material is presented in five sections.The first provides a brief overview of the socioeconomic circumstances of the Aboriginal people in Canada.This is followed by a discussion of entrepreneurship and its role in the economy and in economic development.In the third section, the focus shifts to the Aboriginal response to their current socioeconomic circumstances and the role of entrepreneurship and capacity building through land claims/treaty rights in that response.The fourth section is a discussion of the outcomes achieved by Aboriginal people as a result of their economic development activities.In the concluding section, this paper raises issues to be considered by Canadians -Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal -as we enter the 21st Century. The NeedThe Aboriginal People of Canada are understandably unhappy with their current socioeconomic circumstances and are striving to improve them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it