MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392864955 · doi:10.1007/s00366-024-01950-y

Machine learning mesh-adaptation for laminar and turbulent flows: applications to high-order discontinuous Galerkin solvers

2024· article· en· W4392864955 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering With Computers · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 LEIT Information and Communication TechnologiesAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la RechercheMinistère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche ScientifiqueMinistry of Advanced Education and Skills DevelopmentComunidad de MadridUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid
KeywordsLaminar flowDiscontinuous Galerkin methodTurbulenceAdaptation (eye)Applied mathematicsOrder (exchange)Computer scienceGalerkin methodAdaptive mesh refinementMechanicsMathematicsMathematical optimizationFinite element methodComputational scienceEngineeringPhysicsStructural engineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a machine learning-based mesh refinement technique for steady and unsteady incompressible flows. The clustering technique proposed by Otmani et al. (Phys Fluids 35(2):027112, 2023) is used to mark the viscous and turbulent regions for the flow past a cylinder at $$Re=40$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>40</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (steady laminar flow), at $$Re=100$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (unsteady laminar flow), and at $$Re=3900$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3900</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> (unsteady turbulent flow). Within this clustered region, we use high mesh resolution, while downgrading the resolution outside, to show that it is possible to obtain levels of accuracy similar to those obtained when using a uniformly refined mesh. The mesh adaptation is effective, as the clustering successfully identifies the two flow regions, a viscous/turbulent dominated region (including the boundary layer and wake) that requires high resolution and an inviscid/irrotational region, which only requires low resolution. The new clustering sensor is compared with traditional feature-based sensors (Q-criterion and vorticity based) commonly used for mesh adaptation. Unlike traditional sensors that rely on problem-dependent thresholds, our novel approach eliminates the need for such thresholds and locates the regions that require adaptation. After the initial validation using flows past cylinders, the clustering technique is applied in an engineering context to study the flow around a horizontal axis wind turbine configuration which has been tested experimentally at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. The data used within this framework are generated using a high-order discontinuous Galerkin solver, allowing to locally refine the polynomial order ( p -refinement) in each element of the clustered region. For the laminar test cases, we can reduce the computational cost by 32% (steady $$Re=40$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>40</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> case) and 20% (unsteady $$Re=100$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> case), while we get a reduction of 33% for the $$Re=3900$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3900</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> turbulent case. In the context of the wind turbine, a reduction of 43% in computational cost is observed, while maintaining the accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it