Audio-Visual Event Localization using Multi-task Hybrid Attention Networks for Smart Healthcare Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human perception heavily relies on two primary senses: vision and hearing, which are closely inter-connected and capable of complementing each other. Consequently, various multimodal learning tasks have emerged, with audio-visual event localization (AVEL) being a prominent example. AVEL is a popular task within the realm of multimodal learning, with the primary objective of identifying the presence of events within each video segment and predicting their respective categories. This task holds significant utility in domains such as healthcare monitoring and surveillance, among others. Generally speaking, audio-visual co-learning offers a more comprehensive information landscape compared to single-modal learning, as it allows for a more holistic perception of ambient information, aligning with real-world applications. Nevertheless, the inherent heterogeneity of audio and visual data can introduce challenges related to event semantics inconsistency, potentially leading to incorrect predictions. To track these challenges, we propose a multi-task hybrid attention network (MHAN) to acquire high-quality representation for multimodal data. Specifically, our network incorporates hybrid attention of uni- and parallel cross-modal (HAUC) modules, which consists of a uni-modal attention block and a parallel cross-modal attention block, leveraging multimodal complementary and hidden information for better representation. Furthermore, we advocate for the use of a uni-modal visual task as auxiliary supervision to enhance the performance of multimodal tasks employing a multi-task learning strategy. Our proposed model has been proven to outperform the state-of-the-art results based on extensive experiments conducted on the AVE dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".