PBScaler: A Bottleneck-Aware Autoscaling Framework for Microservice-Based Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autoscaling is critical for ensuring optimal performance and resource utilization in cloud applications with dynamic workloads. However, traditional autoscaling technologies are typically no longer applicable in microservice-based applications due to the diverse workload patterns and complex interactions between microservices. Specifically, the propagation of performance anomalies through interactions leads to a high number of abnormal microservices, making it difficult to identify the root performance bottlenecks (PBs) and formulate appropriate scaling strategies. In addition, to balance resource consumption and performance, the existing mainstream approaches based on online optimization algorithms require multiple iterations, leading to oscillation and elevating the likelihood of performance degradation. To tackle these issues, we propose PBScaler, a bottleneck-aware autoscaling framework designed to prevent performance degradation in a microservice-based application. The key insight of PBScaler is to locate the PBs. Thus, we propose TopoRank, a novel random walk algorithm based on the topological potential to reduce unnecessary scaling. By integrating TopoRank with an offline performance-aware optimization algorithm, PBScaler optimizes replica management without disrupting the online application. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that PBScaler outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches in mitigating performance issues while conserving resources efficiently.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".