MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392931743 · doi:10.1109/tase.2024.3376427

Edge-Assisted Multi-Robot Visual-Inertial SLAM With Efficient Communication

2024· article· en· W4392931743 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Liu, Shuhuan Wen, Jing Zhao, Tony Z. Qiu, Hong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRobotComputer scienceComputer visionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionInertial frame of referenceArtificial intelligenceSimultaneous localization and mappingRobot kinematicsMobile robotPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of cloud computing and edge computing is an effective way to achieve global consistent and real-time multi-robot Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM). Cloud computing effectively solves the problem of limited computing, communication and storage capacity of terminal equipment. However, limited bandwidth and extremely long communication links between terminal devices and the cloud result in serious performance degradation of multi-robot SLAM systems. To reduce the computational cost of feature tracking and improve the real-time performance of the robot, a lightweight SLAM method of optical flow tracking based on pyramid IMU prediction is proposed. On this basis, a centralized multi-robot SLAM system based on a robot-edge-cloud layered architecture is proposed to realize real-time collaborative SLAM. It avoids the problems of limited on-board computing resources and low execution efficiency of single robot. In this framework, only the feature points and keyframe descriptors are transmitted and lossless encoding and compression are carried out to realize real-time remote information transmission with limited bandwidth resources. This design reduces the actual bandwidth occupied in the process of data transmission, and does not cause the loss of SLAM accuracy caused by data compression. Through experimental verification on the EuRoC dataset, compared with the current most advanced local feature compression method, our method can achieve lower data volume feature transmission, and compared with the current advanced centralized multi-robot SLAM scheme, it can achieve the same or better positioning accuracy under low computational load.Note to Practitioners—The purpose of this paper is to reduce the communication load of a Cloud-Edge-Robot system by compressing and transmitting of keyframes and non-keyframes, respectively, which is suitable for a multi-robot SLAM system and can realize multi-robot joint localization and sparse map reconstruction under efficient communication. Currently, remote SLAM or centralized multi-robot SLAM is usually implemented by transferring the whole image or the features and descriptors of the image. In this paper, lightweight SLAM optical flow tracking based on pyramid IMU prediction is implemented to track non-keyframes. At the edge server, tracking between non-keyframes is realized only by transmitting keypoints. For keyframes, the pose estimation is realized by transmitting compressed features and descriptors. Multi-robot localization and map fusion are realized in the cloud through key frame feature information. Experiments on public datasets show that this method is feasible and can achieve high-precision joint positioning with a low amount of transmitted data. In future studies, we will apply this framework to more real-world systems, while achieving rich, accurate map fusion with more advanced features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and EngineeringSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207