Robust Deep Learning-Based Secret Key Generation in Dynamic LiFi Networks Against Concept Drift
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores secret key generation in 5G and beyond LiFi networks using visible light in the downlink and infrared in the uplink. Unlike the existing works, we focus on a realistic indoor environment with multi-user mobility. Given inaccuracies in high-frequency channel models, we introduce the first deep learning model that combines the channel probing and quantization phases to generate initial secret keys with a minimal key disagreement rate (KDR) of 16% between the uplink and downlink, leading to a key generation rate (KGR) of 79 bits/s after information reconciliation. We show that LiFi channel statistics suffer from concept drifts with user density changes in the room. This increases the KDR by 28% - 44% and the generated keys fail to pass the NIST randomness tests. As a countermeasure, we introduce a voting ensemble model that mitigates concept drifts, maintaining a stable 16% KDR, 79 bits/s KGR, and passing NIST tests, despite the varying user densities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it