MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392974630 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2024.02.017

Melt pool instability in surface polishing by laser remelting: preliminary analysis and online monitoring with K-means clustering

2024· article· en· W4392974630 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaWestern University
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsComputer sciencePolishingCluster analysisInstabilitySurface (topology)LaserData miningMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceMechanicsOpticsComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface polishing by laser remelting (SP-LRM) is a novel, versatile, high-speed, and low-cost advanced manufacturing technology for producing high-quality surface finishes. The process utilizes a high-power laser that delivers a large amount of instantaneous energy melting a superficial thin layer of material to a molten state. This allows the melt pool to flow driven by thermocapillary and surface tension forces. The target of the process is to melt, reallocate, and resolidify surface peaks into valleys in order to yield a low surface roughness (Sa). SP-LRM, complexity arises from instabilities occurring during laser-material interactions, resulting from non-linear thermodynamics, initial surface topography, overheating, abrupt changes in laser path trajectories involving acceleration and deceleration, and various other factors. These process instabilities significantly affect the attainment of a desired smooth final surface. Presently, the identification of anomalies resulting from a specific set of laser parameters in laser remelting (LRM) is performed offline by assessing the surface topography of LRM using optical profilometer and correlating it with surface non-uniformities that are indicative of process instabilities. This study streamlines the anomaly detection process and identifies the presence of irregularities using an unsupervised clustering machine learning (ML) technique, specifically K-means clustering. During the laser remelting (LRM) process, a high-speed near-infrared (NIR) camera captures relative thermal emission images, which are then classified into a minimum of three clusters using the K-means algorithm. These clusters correspond to positive and negative axial laser beam positions, indicating shifts in the laser spot on the image, and the stability states of laser-material interactions. Preliminary findings show promising results in the employment of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance LRM as a conventional industrial technology for polishing and structuring tooling surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.672

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it