Revisiting a proof of concept in quartz-OSL bleaching processes using sands from a modern-day river (the Séveraisse, French Alps)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conditions of sediment transport and deposition in highly dynamic fluvio-glacial environments enhance incomplete bleaching of luminescence signals during sunlight exposure. Whatever the geomorphic context or application, partial bleaching has been widely reported and remains a methodological limitation for application of Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) dating methods, potentially resulting in sediment-burial age overestimation. This study focuses on the highly dynamic Séveraisse River (SW French Alps) where modern-day alluvial sands of a braided reach were sampled to assess the degree of quartz-OSL partial bleaching associated with superficial pre- and post-deposition geomorphic processes . Our original approach combines (i) a photogrammetry-based survey, (ii) sediment grain-size analysis, and (iii) measurements of both portable OSL luminescence signals and conventional quartz OSL equivalent doses in modern superficial (from 0.1 to 1 cm) and sub-surface (up to 30 cm) alluvial sands exposed to sunlight for at least 19 days. Our results show high but spatially variable residual luminescence signals at the surface, measured in all grain-size fractions with both the portable luminescence reader (≥5 x10 6 cts/g) and conventional quartz-OSL doses (≥80 Gy), even within the uppermost millimetres of the exposed alluvial surface. Our data thus highlight poor luminescence bleaching in the Séveraisse's modern sands, during both pre-depositional transport and post-depositional exposure. In addition, our study reveals, for the first time, the significant sunlight attenuation over a few millimetres within modern alluvial sediments, perhaps conditioned by dark sand grains, and/or by superficial blanketing by silts (i.e. waning flow stage) that leads to a porosity decrease and very low sunlight penetration. We suggest the occurrence of a critical sediment layer (i.e. only a few mm thick) that could play a key role in bleaching processes for alluvial surfaces, with strong implications for our understanding of residual doses in braided systems' sandy deposits and the dynamics of such alluvial surfaces.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".