A Novel Machine Learning-Based ANFIS Calibrated RISS/GNSS Integration for Improved Navigation in Urban Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) require accurate navigation, but the reliability of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) can be degraded by signal blockage and multipath interference in urban areas. Therefore, a navigation system that integrates a calibrated Reduced Inertial Sensors System (RISS) with GNSS is proposed. The system employs a machine-learning-based Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) as a novel calibration technique to improve the accuracy and reliability of the RISS. The ANFIS-based RISS/GNSS integration provides a more precise navigation solution in such environments. The effectiveness of the proposed integration scheme was validated by conducting tests using real road trajectory and simulated GNSS outages ranging from 50 to 150 s. The results demonstrate a significant improvement in 2D position Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 43.8% and 28% compared to the traditional RISS/GNSS and the frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) Radar (Rad)/RISS/GNSS integrated navigation systems, respectively. Moreover, an improvement of 47.5% and 23.4% in 2D position maximum errors is achieved compared to the RISS/GNSS and the Rad/RISS/GNSS integrated navigation systems, respectively. These results reveal significant improvements in positioning accuracy, which is essential for safe and efficient navigation. The long-term stability of the proposed system makes it suitable for various navigation applications, particularly those requiring continuous and precise positioning information. The ANFIS-based approach used in the proposed system is extendable to other low-end IMUs, making it an attractive option for a wide range of applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".