MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393025023 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295190

TurboBlom: A light and resilient key predistribution scheme with application to Internet of Things

2024· article· en· W4393025023 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)Resilience (materials science)Computer networkNode (physics)Key (lock)Distributed computingRouting protocolRouting (electronic design automation)Computer securityEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Internet of Things (IoT), there are often devices that are computationally too constrained to establish a security key using traditional key distribution mechanisms such as those based on the Diffie-Hellman key exchange. To address this, current solution commonly rely on key predistribution schemes (KPSs). Among KPSs, the Blom scheme provably provides the highest resilience against node capture attacks. This, however, comes at high computational overhead, because the Blom scheme requires many multiplications over a large finite field. To overcome this computational overhead, we present TurboBlom, a novel amendment of the Blom scheme. TurboBlom circumvents the need for field multiplications by utilizing specialized generator matrices, such as random zero-one matrices. We demonstrate that, through this approach, TurboBlom can significantly reduce the computational overhead of the Blom scheme by orders of magnitude. In our next key finding, we demonstrate that TurboBlom offers a level of resilience against node capture that is virtually on par with the Blom scheme. Notably, we prove that the gap between the resilience of the two schemes is exponentially small. These features of TurboBlom (i.e., low computational overhead and high resilience) make it suitable for computationally constrained devices. Such devices exist in abundance in IoT, for example, as part of Low Power and Lossy Networks (LLNs). To demonstrate a sample application of TurboBlom, we show how to use it to enable sender authentication in the Routing Protocol for LLNs (RPL), a standard routing protocol for IoT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it