Data Security in the Cloud Using pTree-based Homomorphic Intrinsic Data Encryption System (pHIDES)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloud usage for storing data and performing operations has gained immense popularity in recent times. However, there are concerns that uploading data to the cloud increases the chances of unauthorized parties accessing it. One way to secure data from unauthorized access is to encrypt it. Even if the data is hacked, the hackers will not be able to retrieve any information from the data without knowing the 'Key' to decrypt it. But when data needs to be used for services such as data analytics, it must be in its original, non-encrypted form. Decrypting the data makes it vulnerable again, which is why Homomorphic Encryption could be the solution to this problem. In this encryption method, the analytical engine can use the encrypted data to perform analysis, where the analysis result will also be in decrypted form. Only authorized users can access the results using the 'Key.' This research proposal proposes a method called pHIDES to enhance data security in the cloud. The pHIDES (pTree-based Homomorphic Intrinsic Data Encryption System) represents data in pTree (Predicate tree) format, a data mining-ready data structure proven to manipulate a large volume of data effectively. The concept of Homomorphic Encryption (HME) along with pHIDES is discussed in our research, along with the algorithmic execution to analyze the effectiveness of the algorithm used to encrypt data in the cloud.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it