YOUTH ASSOCIATIONS AS MECHANISMS OF CREATING THE EDUCATIONAL IDEAL OF UKRAINIANS (XIX – FIRST QUARTER OF XX CENTURY)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article analyzes the forms of public communication of Ukrainian rural youth in the 19th and the first quarter of the 20th centuries, which had an established structure, internal mechanisms of self-organization, provided protection against destructive processes, in particular assimilation, since the systematic direct assimilation of customary and ceremonial culture, etiquette norms and rules contributed to the formation in youth stereotypes of behavior that were a determining vector of upbringing and socialization. The article examines such forms of communication among Ukrainian peasant youth as fairs, village church, brotherhood, sisterhood, neighborhood, community, evening parties. Fairs performed economic functions, boys and girls met at fairs, concluded marriage agreements. At the same time, fairs served as a permanent means of various information and knowledge. The village church has always been one of the main centers of community consolidation, a place for intensive communication of rural youth. Brotherhood and sisterhood were peculiar forms of individual mutual assistance, based on the spiritual kinship that arose between boys and girls as a result of the joint performance of certain ritual actions of a religious and moral content. By the custom of brotherhood, sisterhood, relations of friendship and mutual assistance were cemented for life and became morally binding and sacred, just like family ties. Brothers and sisters took part in economic and family affairs: they decided the matchmaking and marriage of their children, helped in case of illness and material shortages, etc. Folk pedagogy interpreted such relations as ideally demonstrative, opposed to selfishness and malice. Neighborhood and fellow countrymen, which belonged to the kind of kinship that characterized connections by place of birth and residence. The institute of veschernits testified to the acquisition by socialization of qualitatively new features, dimensions, and a change in its general orientation. Along with other aspects of socialization (economic, social, ceremonial), the communicative aspect comes to the fore, the defining moments of which are love and marriage, as well as the process of formation and regulation of gender behavior in the youth community; youth received a certain freedom of action, no longer being constantly under the control of their parents. The author come to the conclusion that youth associations, as a form of public communication, occupied an important place in the education of young people. Boys and girls formed aesthetic preferences, the basics of joint and personal behavior, emotional and intellectual experience, learned folklore heritage. Girls and boys got to know the opposite sex better, mastered the style and forms of behavior characteristic of adults, gained certain knowledge and experience in the field of personal relationships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".