MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

YOUTH ASSOCIATIONS AS MECHANISMS OF CREATING THE EDUCATIONAL IDEAL OF UKRAINIANS (XIX – FIRST QUARTER OF XX CENTURY)

2024· article· en· W4393079076 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Notes Series Pedagogical Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal Economic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianEtiquetteFriendshipPeasantSociologyMutual aidGender studiesQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceLawSocial scienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the forms of public communication of Ukrainian rural youth in the 19th and the first quarter of the 20th centuries, which had an established structure, internal mechanisms of self-organization, provided protection against destructive processes, in particular assimilation, since the systematic direct assimilation of customary and ceremonial culture, etiquette norms and rules contributed to the formation in youth stereotypes of behavior that were a determining vector of upbringing and socialization. The article examines such forms of communication among Ukrainian peasant youth as fairs, village church, brotherhood, sisterhood, neighborhood, community, evening parties. Fairs performed economic functions, boys and girls met at fairs, concluded marriage agreements. At the same time, fairs served as a permanent means of various information and knowledge. The village church has always been one of the main centers of community consolidation, a place for intensive communication of rural youth. Brotherhood and sisterhood were peculiar forms of individual mutual assistance, based on the spiritual kinship that arose between boys and girls as a result of the joint performance of certain ritual actions of a religious and moral content. By the custom of brotherhood, sisterhood, relations of friendship and mutual assistance were cemented for life and became morally binding and sacred, just like family ties. Brothers and sisters took part in economic and family affairs: they decided the matchmaking and marriage of their children, helped in case of illness and material shortages, etc. Folk pedagogy interpreted such relations as ideally demonstrative, opposed to selfishness and malice. Neighborhood and fellow countrymen, which belonged to the kind of kinship that characterized connections by place of birth and residence. The institute of veschernits testified to the acquisition by socialization of qualitatively new features, dimensions, and a change in its general orientation. Along with other aspects of socialization (economic, social, ceremonial), the communicative aspect comes to the fore, the defining moments of which are love and marriage, as well as the process of formation and regulation of gender behavior in the youth community; youth received a certain freedom of action, no longer being constantly under the control of their parents. The author come to the conclusion that youth associations, as a form of public communication, occupied an important place in the education of young people. Boys and girls formed aesthetic preferences, the basics of joint and personal behavior, emotional and intellectual experience, learned folklore heritage. Girls and boys got to know the opposite sex better, mastered the style and forms of behavior characteristic of adults, gained certain knowledge and experience in the field of personal relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it